Being brought up in the Manchester area, the Lodekka was something I only
encountered on trips with my Dad, on holiday and later, when travelling on
business.
Something that never occurred to me before is that whilst many of the
type used the Cave Brown Cave system of cooling/heat exchanging, others didn't
- sometimes fleets had similar vehicles with and without depending on the
batch.
Could someone outline the pros and cons and why some operators had both
specs or point me in the direction of an explanation, preferably on the net.
Phil Blinkhorn
16/05/13 - 06:36
Wing Commander Cave-Brown-Cave was I think later Professor of Engineering at the University of Southampton, which was where he came up with the idea that a heat-exchanger system would be more efficient at cooling the engine whilst warming the saloons than a conventional radiator . . . it wasn't, see www.flickr.com/photos/ for the evidence! I think the reason the system failed was that buses stop and start, and there just wasn't the flow-through of air to keep the system working efficiently, and if the engine was worked hard on - on hilly routes - that just added to the problems (Bristol OC struggled with their CBC Lodekkas). Why did Tilling/Bristol CV adopt the system to the extent that they did? - I'm sure somebody out there has an idea . . .
Philip Rushworth
16/05/13 - 11:22
I had often wondered how it acquired this name. I thought it was three people! I once queried here without success the two ducts at the back end of a VR- not heating/cooling but giant vac holes for sucking fag & mints packets out- or does anyone know different or what became of them in use? They don't seem to have caught on...
Joe
16/05/13 - 13:53
Cave Brown Cave was Professor of Engineering at Southampton following a very
interesting career in the RAF and some rather clever wartime work as
head of the Directorate of Camouflage.
In some ways the CBC heating/cooling system, as applied to buses,
had a hint of the Heath Robinson about it but Bristols were obviously
convinced of its benefits.
It would also be interesting to know how the modified system used
on Manchester's last PD2s differed from the system used on the Lodekka,
apart from the obvious visible differences.
Phil Blinkhorn
16/05/13 - 16:36
I don’t think it’s widely known that West Yorkshire Road Car fitted CBC systems to three single deckers in the 50s, and to my knowledge these vehicles ran with the modifications until disposal. Originally they tried fitting it to a pre-war L5G, but then fitted it to an LS5G and two LL5Gs. Here is the LS and one of the LLs. On the photograph of the LLs you can see the difference in the modification of the indicator box. The three drawings are ex-West Yorkshire official ones and I think they clearly show how the system works.
David Rhodes
17/05/13 - 07:04
Thanks for a very useful answer David. I certainly wasn't aware of the use on single deckers, and the drawings make the way the system works very plain.
Phil Blinkhorn
17/05/13 - 07:05
An account of the origins and development of the Cave-Browne-Cave heating and
ventilation system can be found in the TPC book 'Southampton City
Transport' by A K MacFarlane-Watt, published in 1977.
The account is too long to reproduce here but the origin of the
system is interesting in that it came from an approach from the Ministry
of Transport to the Society of Motor Manufacturers about 'unhygienic and
unpleasant conditions' found on buses. The matter was passed to the
Motor Industry Research Association and actioned by Wing Commander
Cave-Browne-Cave, the Association's Technical Director and also a
Professor of Engineering at Southampton University. Southampton City
Transport became involved as one its Guy Arabs, number 162, was the test
bed for the system.
Michael Elliott
17/05/13 - 18:12
Interesting comment from David in respect of the vehicles WYRCC used for their trials. I have a bought slide of what I'd always thought of as an MW in this format. I can't read the registration, but the fleet number is SMG 1. My knowledge of the operator is limited to what I used to see in Morecambe on the X88.
Pete Davies
25/05/13 - 08:22
David, thank you for posting the drawings of the CBC system as applied to
West Yorkshire's L types, as I'd often wondered exactly how the system
worked on the single-deckers. As you say, WY converted three L types and
an LS, and the Company was heavily involved in much of the early CBC
experimental work. The first two vehicles to be modified in 1953 were
LL5Gs 413 (JWU 883) and 407 (JWU 877) respectively, both dating from
1951. (These vehicles were later renumbered SGL13 and SGL7). In 1954, a
recently withdrawn 1940 L5G (182: DWW 587) had its bible-type
destination display replaced by a radiator, air intake and ventilator
assembly - the front intake being of a louvered type similar to that on
the LS5G in David's photo. The L5G was not operated in service, unlike
the LL5Gs, but was used solely as a test bed vehicle. Following on from
these experiments, dual-purpose LS5G EUG1(LWR 431) was converted in late
1954. As can be seen from the shot, the CBC equipment was mounted within
the front dome, with the destination box being moved to a position below
the windscreen as a result. This vehicle was later demoted to bus status
and renumbered SUG1, and later still, fitted with bus seats, equipped
for one man operation, and renumbered SMG1. It retained the CBC system
until withdrawal, and could be seen regularly in Harrogate with its
distinctive small 'shark's fin' air outlet mounted on the roof towards
the front of the vehicle.
As a WY apprentice, the first fitter I worked with was a
thoroughly likeable chap (and AUEW shop steward) called Albert Jackson.
Albert had worked on the two LL5G conversions, and been involved in
fitting them up with the CBC system. I remember him saying that you
needed to be something of a contortionist when fitting the radiators and
pipework above the cab and within the confines of the destination box.
(At that time Albert would have been about thirty years of age, so
presumably may have been chosen for his agility!). He said the
experience was etched in his memory, but on the positive side he did say
he had found the experiments very interesting to take part in. He may
well have seen the technical drawings you have posted David!
Brendan Smith
23/12/14 - 06:00
Most interesting comments about this. May I add some thoughts?
A clear advantage of the system, from an air circulation point of view,
was that conventional floor-mounted heaters just heated up stuffy air
that was already inside the bus.
The CBC system allowed natural air pressure, as air struck the front of
the bus, to push fresh air into the bus. Therefore (as on a Routemaster,
which has a small grille on the front), the natural constant ingress of
fresh air over a radiator/heat exchanger keeps the bus relatively
condensation free, and fresh. It worked.
Possibly the biggest failing of the system was that it was not
pressurised. So, if the engine became hot and water overheated, water
would be lost when the bus was at low revs, by vertically 'fountaining'
out of the air vent pipe which was on the top of the small header tank,
and thereby all over the bonnet top (or, in extreme occasions, in a jet
right up the front of the bus).
Had the system had a pressurised overflow, this would have lessened the
opportunity for water to be easily expelled and for the remainder to
boil, resulting in a jet of steam from the said vent.
Top Deck Travel retained its CBC system for buses that ran overland
trips. I was intrigued as to how they managed to keep them cool - and I
found that they had significantly increased the size of the header
tanks.
Naturally, with the majority of the radiator water in two tanks above
upper saloon floor level, and the header tank at engine-top level, just
gravity would tend to assist water to be expelled, as did any air locks
in the system.
As was mentioned above, gentle revving at a constant speed when topping
up the radiator, would draw water in and expel air out.
The other flaw was the lack of any kind of fan(s) for the twin radiator
tanks. So if the system was heading towards boiling, there was nothing
to stop that other than natural air flow. Instructions in the cabs of
CBC Lodekka FLFs told drivers to ensure the rad vents diverted hot air
outside the bus if the temperature gauge read above 200F (i.e. to give
maximum airflow across the tanks).
Gardner engines tend to get hot and expel water on constant climbs. So,
with the unfanned and unpressurised system, a long hill climb, with a
following wind especially, would ensure minimal airflow, if any, into
the CBC vents. Then, the first time the bus would stop for any length of
time, with low revs on tick over (and reduced water pumping action),
water would be expelled in a fountain from the vent from the header
tank, which could be dangerous for any conductor, whose face would be
about 2ft from that pipe when clambering up the front to change the
destination/number blinds.
On most FLFs, the CBC tanks were also covered by thermostatically
controlled Varivane shutters, as has been mentioned. These could also
stick shut (as their 'default' position) and so, in many fleets, small
rubber bungs would be inserted in some buses where this became
problematic. Obviously, as all airflow was blocked with the Varivanes
shut (very efficient, to warm up the radiator from cold) if the engine
reached normal temperature, but the vents stayed shut, boiling would
quickly result.
Gardner engines could take a lot of cooking, so it wasn't unduly common
for buses to boil for significant periods without seizing. Bristol BVW
engines seemed worse than Gardners for boiling issues with CBC cooling
systems.
But most of the time, most buses ran perfectly well, with good flows of
heat and keeping fresh, in cold weather. Ironically, when the system
boiled, the airflow would often become cold, either through lack of
water, or drivers correctly diverting airflow to outside, rather than
inside (which was done by 'umbrella handle' handles to the offside of
the windscreen on older CBC FLFs, and air-operated switches on later
examples).
Following some nasty incidents with people becoming scalded, and some
operators (Bristol itself being one) having issues, the CBC system was
tending to be shunned more and more - although some operators, like
Southern Vectis (which had none) and Eastern Counties (which had just a
handful of FS5Gs so equipped, I think the only 5-cylinder Gardner
Lodekkas to have CBC) - the system was eventually dropped.
The basics of the system made sense and worked well. It only failed
through mainly the unpressurised and unfanned system and the small
header tank.
I hope this will add to peoples' understanding.
Bristol-ECW double-deckers' visible overheating displays returned with
the Series 3 VRT/SLs of course, where (unlike the VRT/SL and VRT/SL2
variants) the radiator was given a vent pipe on the side of the roof
just behind the front offside corner. This was meant to have been long
enough to contain radiator water even if at boiling point, but in
practice, would not, leading to cascades of rusty brown water from the
roof down to the driver's cab windows. But of course that was just a
radiator overflow, not part of a heating and ventilating system as the
CBC vents were.
The attached photo shows a 'rare capture' by me of a FLF6LX Lodekka, where the system had reached boiling point and a fountain of boiling water is being ejected from the small header tank, through the small hole between bonnet top and front cowling, and is splashing the underside of the canopy. It was known for some buses to eject a fountain of water over the roof or into the upper deck front window hopper-vents at times. In my experience, each bus was different. Some operators (Crosville being one) actually fitted some CBC Lodekkas 'straws' to the vent pipes, so that water would be blown back over the bonnet top rather than loosely up the front of the bus. The last time I saw this was on an ex-Eastern Counties CBC FS5G.
John G. Lidstone
25/12/14 - 07:11
It has always puzzled me that West Yorkshire, who experimented with CBC which they fitted into two post-war L types (LL5G and one LS type) seemed not to have problems with these. I remember one LL5G, SGL7, was a regular on my local route and I was never aware of it boiling up, even though the route was quite hilly. I rode on the LS conversion (SUG1) and even had a trip on it on service 53 Bradford to Harrogate and it seemed fine. I have to say though that this latter vehicle did look very strange with its destination box full of cooling vents and the desti fixed below the windscreen. They led normal service lives in this form. Does anybody else know otherwise?
David Rhodes
Comments regarding the above are more than welcome please get in touch via the 'Contact Page' or by email at
All rights to the design and layout of this website are reserved Old Bus Photos does not set or use Cookies but Google Analytics will set four see this
Old Bus Photos from Saturday 25th April 2009 to Friday 9th February 2018