Bristol Omnibus - Bristol Lodekka - YHT 962 - L8450
Bristol Omnibus
1957
Bristol Lodekka LDL6G
ECW H37/33RD
Among the 250 LD chassis built in 1957 as the 134th sanction were scattered six chassis to the new
legal length on two axles of 30ft. They are generally referred to as type LDL, but I have seen LLD used
in some factory documents. Bristol Omnibus L8450 is numerically the last and seen here looking miserable
in late 1962 at the Holly Lane, Clevedon terminus of service 25.
I seem to remember that as well
as being the first 30ft long Bristol double deckers, instead of the then standard vacuum assisted
hydraulic system, they had compressed air servo hydraulic brakes, as later adopted for the Flat Floor
(F) series chassis. Whether the LDL had air suspension, I can’t recall. Perhaps the last eight vehicles
of the 138th sanction, designated LDS that went to Brighton, were used for air suspension trials, which
also became a very successful standard on the F series (and eventually the RE!).
As a graduate
trainee at BOC, I remember being allocated this vehicle for an evening overtime duty. As a novice
driver, with a full load at Bristol Bus Station, to my embarrassment, I was unable to release the
handbrake! A helpful inspector recommended depressing the footbrake at the same time and hey presto all
was well!
The Lodekka front cowl hitherto had a single foot hold each side of the central number
plate, but these six and subsequent flat floor models had a step to accommodate two feet to the
nearside.
The ECW body is distinguished by having an extra short bay upstairs, otherwise you may
miss the longer last bay downstairs. There was also an extra emergency exit - the saloon window behind
the cab would open. It retained the original rear door window layout with the larger radius top corners
towards the centreline, rather than the arrangement on the F series where the larger radius top corners
were outboard.
The six vehicles must have been very successful prototypes as they stayed in
service in one form or another for a good lifetime.
Photograph and Copy contributed by Geoff Pullin
31/03/16 - 06:50
Comparing this photo with photos of a ‘conventional’ 27ft LD it seems the extra length for the 30 foot LDL was all accommodated in the rear overhang. In other words the wheelbase seems to be the same for both models. Have I got this right or is it a trick of camera angle on the photos? If this is the case it must have pushed the Construction and Use Regulations to the limit!
Philip Halstead
31/03/16 - 06:51
Another great view from your collection, Geoff! I have a view of one of the VDV series in my pile of forthcoming submissions to Peter.
Pete Davies