Provincial – AEC Regal/Regent I – EHO 282 – 15
Provincial (Gosport & Fareham Omnibus Co)
1943
AEC Regal/Regent I
Reading H??/??R
Doubt exists about the vehicle chassis type, but here is the story as of now.
In 1943, Mr
Orme-White carried out his first (of many) vehicle re-constructions, involving an AEC Regal I (although
recent research suggests it was a Regent I chassis), purchased from the War Department with the
registration DK 7791. The original source of the chassis is unknown.
Provincial re-conditioned the
chassis, fitted a 7.7 litre AEC engine and got Reading’s of Portsmouth to body it. It was their first
double deck offering, of utility specification and painted wartime grey. It was also re-registered EHO
282 and numbered 15.
In 1952, it was rebuilt again by Reading and lasted in service until 1959.
Its body was then donated to number 12 (FHO 604) and the chassis scrapped.
What is interesting is
that a small and almost unknown bodybuilder was given permission to build an austerity body and it might
well have been its sole effort. The year of build was after the initial austerity bodies had been built
on ‘unfrozen’ chassis, but before full-scale austerity bodybuilding had got underway. Did Reading come
up with its own design or use someone else’s austerity plans? If the latter, the question is whose does
it resemble?
Photograph Reading Coachworks (from the website below).
Copy contributed
by Chris Hebbron using material by Ray Tull and
Stewart Brett from the website http://www.regent8.co.uk/regents.htm
———
08/09/11 - 14:27
What clue is there in the fuel pump on the bulkhead?
Joe
———
08/09/11 - 14:28
Probably of no significance at all, but the next registration to the original donor vehicle, DK 7792, was a Regal supplied to Yelloway in 1932.
Stephen Ford
———
08/09/11 - 14:29
The DK registration on the chassis was a Rochdale area plate.
Roger Broughton
———
08/09/11 - 14:30
Looks like a semi-floating hub at the back, so can’t be later than 1932. And what a well-proportioned body!
Ian Thompson
———
I lived in the Gosport area as a child from 1949 to 1952, and well remember
the Provincial (Gosport & Fareham) Regents. These initially puzzled me as their sound was so unlike
the London Transport AECs that I recalled as a very small boy from 1946, when I lived in Selsdon,
Croydon. I personally much preferred the Guy/Park Royal bodied Guy Arab IIIs that served the
Alverstoke and Haslar Route 11 on which I lived, and the Arab III is still one of my favourite bus
types.
It is now thought that EHO 282 was a Regent. The Regal had a longer wheelbase than the
double deck chassis. The photo indicates that the proportions of the bus are in keeping with those
of a Regent, whereas a double deck body on a Regal would have necessitated a short length behind the
rear axle to keep within the 26ft overall length limit of the time.
Roger Cox
———
10/09/11 - 07:42
One thing I didn’t mention originally was the bespoke double destination blind
boxes, a Provincial’ feature, even then. All extra work in austerity times.
And are they
safety rails high up on the upper-deck front windows? They don’t look like vents or the like.
It looks as if there’s a Regal/Regent badge on the radiator grill itself - pity it’s
illegible.
Thx for the additional comments which have shed some more light on this intriguing
bus.
And I think most of us echo Roger’s comment about proportion - austerity bus bodies have
a charm of their own.
Chris Hebbron
———
10/09/11 - 07:43
And Roger could that also be the explanation as to why the Leon Lion had a centre entrance utility body fitted?
Chris Barker
———
11/09/11 - 08:18
I think that you have hit on the answer about the Leon Lion, Chris. Photos can be a bit misleading sometimes, but the picture of the Lion does seem to show that the rear wheel is located directly under the rearmost but one window on this five bay body. The centre bay is decidedly wider than the rest, so that all the other bays are obviously of pretty short length, and the rear axle seems to be located well to the rear of the bus. A centre or front entrance would have been the best solution in the circumstances.
Roger Cox
———
17/04/12 - 14:18
The original post mentions Mr Orme-White. I’ve no idea how true it is, but I have been told that Mr White of the Provincial Tramways group (Gosport and Fareham, Portsdown & Horndean among others) was the same Mr White of White’s Removals, and this is the reason behind the removal company’s "sponsorship" of some trams under restoration in the Portsmouth area.
Pete Davies