Bournemouth Corporation - Daimler Fleetline - ALJ 341B - 41
Bournemouth Corporation
1964
Daimler Fleetline CRG6LX
MH Cars H44/33F
Here are two photos I took in November 1964 at The Square in Bournemouth of one of the corporations
unique Daimler Fleetlines fitted with bodies by MH Cars of Belfast the only bodies by this manufacturer
delivered to the UK mainland they were part of an order for similar buses being built for Belfast
Corporation at that time but diverted to Bournemouth who were suffering a vehicle shortage, registered
ALJ 340/41 fleet No’s 40/41. Reported by Buses Illustrated magazine as being delivered in Belfast livery
but repainted before entering service, does any one know what happened to them after they left
Bournemouth?
I may be wrong but I think MH Cars later became Potters who in turn became Alexanders
(Belfast).
Photograph and Copy contributed by Diesel Dave
ALJ 340B has been preserved, initially at Mallard Road, but the 2012 PSVC listing gives her at Winkleigh.
Pete Davies
11/09/12 - 07:23
An interesting purchase by Bournemouth. I suspect that Alexander had been involved with MH Cars all the way down the line, as this body style is very much like those supplied by Alexander to Newcastle in 1964.
Paul Haywood
12/09/12 - 07:15
It’s not a particularly pretty bus, but it’s not quite as bad as the first Alexander Atlantean body. Sheffield had just one, 369. My favourites are outside the scope of this forum - Sheffield’s Voith/AN68s with peaks on the Alexander body (with flat screens upper and lower).
David Oldfield
18/04/13 - 07:25
It always been rumoured that these two Fleetlines were diverted from an order for Belfast Corporation Transport. I am not sure the source of this but the two Bournemouth chassis numbers bear no relation to the batch of 150 Fleetlines which Belfast ordered even though they were built in between the two batches. The chassis numbers of 40/1 are concurrent with the CRU batch but not any Belfast vehicle. I believe they were built at the same time and may have been to a virtually identical specification to Belfast’s vehicles. I have also seen it reported that they were delivered in Belfast red but have never seen a photograph of either in this scheme and I am sure someone would have taken a photo on such an unusual event.
Bill Headley
24/08/13 - 10:32
I have a photo of the ex Belfast Fleetlines in the Bournemouth body shop in Belfast livery having the destination screen layout altered to Bournemouth’s standard pattern, prior to painting in Bournemouth livery. So these two buses definitely arrived in Belfast livery.
David Chalk
25/08/13 - 06:28
Could you post it, David?
Chris Hebbron
25/08/13 - 06:29
I visited Winkleigh on the 7th October 2012 where many of the preserved Bournemouth buses are now stored. I’m certain the bus on the right of this photo is Daimler Fleetline ALJ 340B referred to by Pete Davies.
Mac Head
11/10/13 - 17:18
David, I would love to see the "delivery" photo of the MH Cars
Fleetline at Bournemouth in Belfast red.
I believe I have finally got to the bottom of the
mystery. What became Bournemouth 40/1 (ALJ 340/1B) were nothing to do with a Belfast Corporation
order which is why their chassis numbers don’t tally with any Belfast vehicles. The chassis were
originally destined to be bodied and delivered as demonstrators to Coras Iompair Eireann in Dublin
for a trial. It appears that Leyland objected quoting an unwritten agreement between CIE and Leyland
and the proposed programme was abandoned. Bournemouth was struggling for new vehicles because of a
strike at Weymanns in which the CRU xxxC batch were caught and these two "complete"
vehicles were offered and sold to Bournemouth. The fact that the chassis numbers immediately precede
the Bournemouth batch appears to be coincidental. So it would appear that the mystery is finally
solved.
Bill Headley
15/10/13 - 07:05
One further question for David - did 40/1 (ALJ 340/1B) arrive on trade plates or did they have Northern Ireland registration numbers on them?
Bill Headley
13/02/14 - 10:46
My brother and I grew up in Bournemouth in the 1970s having moved from Bury
(Lancashire). We were overwhelmed by the difference between the Bury Corporation/Selnec Fleet and
that of Bournemouth. The Bournemouth Fleetlines and Atlanteans were modern, bright and impeccably
clean compared to the Leyland Titans of Bury/Selnec. We lived on Route 17 which seemed to always get
the newest vehicles. We were amazed when we first saw the two MH cars bodied buses and grew fond of
them because of their quirkiness. We didn’t see them that often though and I think only travelled on
them once or twice. Our favourites were the CRU … C batch of open toppers on Route 12 which
followed the same route as Route 17 in Alum Chine. We sometimes tried to use them coming home from
school but the drivers refused to accept our bus passes on that route!!
Happy Days!!
David R
14/02/14 - 06:47
The brother of David R. My brother and I went to different schools in our teens with very different school bus times. Whereas he started school at just gone 8am, my school at the other side of town started at 9.25am, but finished at 4.30pm. in the first year of secondary school, our school bus route 44 (45 was from Southbourne and 46 from Winton and Charminster. The morning run in 1975 we always received the dual door Leyland Titan PD3/1s, but the evening run was always Daimler Fleetlines or Leyland Atlanteans. However, on a number of occasions we received the MH Cars Fleetlines - which if I remember rightly seated 78 instead of the usual 73? (i am sure someone will know the answer to that). what always amazed me was the MH cars Fleetlines never seemed to operate the 45 or 46 school bus runs - only the 44! The other rarity was during the winter, we would sometimes receive one of the open top fleet - roofed of course! It was always fun to spot ‘Durham’ or ‘Northumberland’ doing the 44 school run! indeed happy days that year, before the new batches of vehicles started to appear, and the PD3/1s disappeared…
Jonathan R
14/02/14 - 13:32
Yes that’s right Jonathan. They put on a special service in the morning at
about 07.35 to take the kids who lived in Alum Chine/Westbourne to the Square to catch the normal
service route 29/32 to Charminster to be at East Way at 08:15 for school start time at 08:20. School
finished at 15:25 and if we were quick to catch the 15:28 from East Way to the Square in time to get
the 15:45 route 17 back to Westbourne and Alum Chine. It was quite a rush in the afternoon I can
say!!
The whole point of the staggered school start times was so that one batch of buses could
do 2 school runs thus reducing the total number of buses needed.
David R
06/04/14 - 18:20
I grew up in Bournemouth during the 1960s/early 1970s, and remember 40/41 when
they were new. They were used on route 1 to Christchurch in their early days. Unfortunately, I lived
only a mile from Bournemouth School and was envious of those boys who got two (or more) bus rides a
day as part of their education! At primary school we did have various bus rides for swimming, etc,
but these never involved 40/41 and in fact I do not think I ever rode on them despite being a
frequent user of buses for getting around the town.
As David R points out, there was a close
relationship between the Corporation and the Education Dept. at The Town Hall - all our local
journeys for school purposes were undertaken in Corporation buses.
Grahame Arnold
08/04/14 - 07:47
Ah yes the trips to Stokewood Road Swimming Baths.
IIRC we had the
Leyland Leopards for some of those journeys! I also think we used a Roadliner from time to time. The
only time we used another "firm" was when we used Shamrock and Rambler for the CCF
(Combined Cadet Force) journeys to Portsmouth and elsewhere.
David R
05/07/14 - 17:28
I was born in Boscombe (Hospital) sixty years ago and for the next twenty one years lived in Barrack Road, Christchurch, with the passing Bournemouth Corporation buses, trolley buses and the green Hants & Dorset Bristols. Before the introduction of the rear engined Daimlers I remember seeing a white and blue version in use. Does anyone know if it was a trial unit or does this have any bearing on the ‘Belfast’ debate?
Mike Giles
06/07/14 - 08:20
Bournemouth had the Daimler Fleetline 7000 HP demonstrator on trial for a
while - which was in a blue livery as I recall, and had also had the Alexander bodied Leyland
Atlantean in the Glasgow orange livery on loan as well (SGD 669). Also tried at about that time was
7552 MX, an AEC Renown demonstrator, which was in a blue and white livery.
In the event,
Bournemouth ordered Fleetlines and Atlanteans with bodies by Weymann (who had been body supplier for
the postwar trolleys), but with a front end very similar to the Alexander demonstrator.
My
understanding at the time was that delivery of the completed vehicles was somewhat protracted -
problems at Weymann’s I believe - and hence two MH Cars bodied vehicles were obtained to the Belfast
design (and apparently they were vehicles already completed for the Belfast order). They definitely
lacked the ‘style’ of the vehicles Bournemouth wanted, but were a ‘stop-gap’ measure by
the transport department who wanted new vehicles urgently .
Peter Delaney
11/07/14 - 16:32
The two Bournemouth MH Cars bodied vehicles were not "part of an already
completed order for Belfast". They were built as a joint venture between Daimler and MH Cars
and MH Coachworks to supply a fully "Irish built bus" which they could offer to CIE. The
plan was to give two Fleetline to CIE on extended demonstration. The two chassis 60929 and 60930
were built long after the second batch of Belfast chassis (which had been 60644-60706)and were
supplied to MH in CKD form to be built up in the MH factory at Dunmore in Belfast. Knowing that
Belfast was successfully running 150 Fleetlines already 60929 and 60930 were built to full Belfast
specification and were even painted in Belfast’s red and cream livery.
In the meantime Leyland
having got wind of the proposed deal for CIE to have two MH Cars Daimler Fleetlines on extended
demonstration, cited an agreement between Leyland and CIE. To meet CIE’s needs and to get vehicles
immediately, Leyland cobbled together a group of Atlanteans from Bolton, Glasgow and Liverpool and
dispatched them to Dublin.
At the time Daimler were aware that Bournemouth’s forthcoming batch
of Fleetlines were bogged down in an industrial dispute at Weymanns and did a deal to sell them
these two additional vehicles "on the cheap". This is why these two vehicles arrived in
Bournemouth in Belfast colours and to Belfast specifications. The one thing I cannot ascertain is -
did they arrive in Bournemouth on Northern Irish number plates or did they arrive on trade plates?
David Chalk said he had photos of them on delivery but hasn’t uploaded them and I am not aware
of any other photos of the pair pre-delivery. I hope this clarifies the background to these two
vehicles.
Bill Headley
12/07/14 - 06:47
Thank you to Bill for clarifying the background to this - I had missed seeing his earlier post (having answered the comment about blue & white demonstrators) - the MH bodied ones certainly ‘appeared’ to be standard Belfast buses at the time! The sequence of chassis numbers, though, is ‘interesting’ - I seem to recall that order books / chassis registers for Daimlers of that period survive in the Coventry Archives.
Peter Delaney
13/07/14 - 06:59
Just found this page and can add some information re; surviving examples of
the 1965 Daimler Fleetlines.
Of the open-top batch (180-189, there are 3 known survivors all
of which are driveable but undergoing various form of restoration works.
180 - Based in
Midlands, last seen in Bournemouth colours but may appear in a new colour scheme (tbc)
184 -
Owned by myself and based in Dorset and currently is having it’s upstairs floor replaced, with some
frame repairs. It will be restored to Bournemouth colours. Although in good structural and
mechanical condition, it’s suffered from having a lot of modifications from original spec over the
years.
187 - Last seen residing in Sussex and will be restored to London Transport colours.
Of the fixed top batch (190-199), the last known survivor was 197 but this hasn’t been seen
since BPTA days about the late 1990’s I’d say. I’ve never been able to track this one down and it’s
fate is a bit of a mystery.
Nick Jackson
Vehicle reminder shot for this posting
12/04/15 - 07:12
Both 40 and 41 were a diverted to Bournemouth as part of the 150 strong order
for Fleetlines being bodied by MH Cars in 1963/64. Bournemouth had a pressing need for new vehicles
urgently in the summer of 1964 as the Atlanteans on order were running late. Bournemouth was already
in negotiation with Daimler for the 1965 delivery and it was found that two Fleetlines could be
diverted very quickly. As said above, they arrived in Belfast colours and were modified and painted
before use.
The reason that the two chassis numbers are out of sequence with the remaining
Belfast buses is because Daimler issued numbers based on when orders were received and not when the
chassis were built. The two received separate chassis numbers as they were ordered separately, but
arrived in Belfast colours as they were intended for Belfast and would have had chassis numbers in
the Belfast sequence if they had not been diverted to Bournemouth. The tale about CIE being involved
is completely without foundation.
James Prince
13/04/15 - 07:41
Here is the photo of one of the two vehicles having its blind apertures
altered to Bournemouth’s style at Mallard Road Depot in June 1964. Although already partially
repainted, it’s clear that the front panel is still in Belfast Red and the windscreen surrounds are
still white.
Copyright unknown
Chris Hebbron
16/04/15 - 06:40
I worked for Bournemouth Corporation as a mechanic from 1978-80 when I left as a result of an injury. I distinctly remember a number of the older Fleetlines (the ones without power steering) being sold to Hong Kong. They were cracking buses and were fitted with Gardiner engines and were very much more reliable than the Leyland Atlanteans which made up the bulk of the fleet.
Terry Hall
Quick links to the - Comments Page - Contact Page - Home Page
Please leave a comment
Please Note if you want to send a photograph with your comment please use the Contact Page by clicking here or send as an attachment via email.